HOT TOPICS >> Droid | Google Voice | Windows Mobile 7 | Fixed-Mobile Convergence | iPhone | RIM
Why one wireless and not another?
Comments
Curtis, I'm in total agreement with you. However, the reason it appears that these companies haven't learned anything in 20 years is that most of their staff were in diapers when ISDN was rolled out.
This is a common problem in other fields, particularly SW coding (where kids growing up on dysfunctional Windows SW assume that SW-that-doesn't-work is OK) and especially in web-development.
Some large companies, like IBM, have websites that render properly on everything going back to Netscape 2. But others, including some large banks (surprisingly) only work on the latest MS browsers with FLASH.
I was recently on a site for a scientific electronics supplier, and parts were updated using FLASH.
The scientific community is running Linux, and 64-bit Linux doesn't have FLASH support (to my knowledge), so while the owners are expecting that their site is "better" they have in-fact blocked access to the very clientèle that they are chasing.
Unless some very experienced manpower is given responsibility for setting pricing at the carriers, the "kiddies" can take years of technological development and burn it with marketing screw-ups.








